Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Letters to the Editor
2011
- August 19, 2011: CNSC response to Michael Duguay’s letter entitled “Accident nucléaire en préparation à Gentilly‑2?” (nuclear accident brewing at Gentilly-2?) published in Le Courrier Sud on August 12, 2011
- May 27, 2011: CNSC Response to the Article “Michel Duguay recommande la fermeture de Point Lepreau” Published on May 26, 2011 by L'Étoile
- May 24, 2011: CNSC response to the article “Point Lepreau : attention, danger!” published on May 20, 2011 in L’Acadie Nouvelle
- February 9, 2011: CNSC Response to to the op-ed entitled “Nuclear radiation is forever” published in the Ottawa Citizen on February 8, 2011
- January 12, 2011: CNSC Response to Stansfield Op-Ed published in the Chronicle Herald on January 8, 2011
- January 7, 2011: CNSC response to the editorial "Wind power is healthy” published in the Windsor Star on January 6, 2011
2010
- November 10, 2010: CNSC response to the article entitled “Port Hope warned of “life and death” threat”, published in the Toronto Star on November 10, 2010
- August 9, 2010: CNSC response to the article entitled "Gentilly-2 : Hydro suspend des contrats" published in Le Nouvelliste on August 6, 2010
- June 10, 2010: CNSC response to the article entitled “New nuclear power plants carry more risk, report finds” published in the Ottawa Citizen on May 31, 2010
- June 9, 2010: CNSC response to the article entitled “Une question de santé – Dix bonnes raisons de dire non à Gentilly-2” published in Le Devoir on May 31, 2010
- May 10, 2010: CNSC response to the letter entitled “CANDU reactors release more tritium” published in the Peace River Record Gazette on April 21, 2010
- May 7, 2010: CNSC response to the article entitled “Uranium Update - Revisiting Strateco, their Mistissini opposition and the activism against the proposed uranium exploration project” published in The Nation on April 23, 2010
- May 5, 2010: CNSC response to the letter entitled “Neuf questions auxquelles M. Michael Binder devrait répondre” [Nine questions Mr. Michael Binder should answer] published on April 4, 2010, in Le Bulletin régional of Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean
- April 26, 2010: CNSC response to the article entitled “Gentilly-2 : le tritium émis en trop grande quantité?” [Gentilly-2: is too much tritium being released?], published in Le Courrier Sud on April 18, 2010
- April 16, 2010: CNSC response to the editorial entitled “Cleaning our own house”, published in the Ottawa Citizen on April 15, 2010
- April 1, 2010: CNSC response to an editorial published in Le Droit on March 30, 2010, entitled “Mêlons-nous de nos affaires!” [Let’s mind our own business!]
- March 24, 2010: CANDU reactors are operated safely CNSC response to a letter published in Le Bulletin régional on March 12, 2010, entitled “Emballement possible du réacteur CANDU à Gentilly-2”
- March 5, 2010: CNSC response to the opinion article published in Le Nouvelliste on March 1, 2010 entitled "Les Québécois peuvent encore dire non"
- March 4, 2010: CNSC response to Le Devoir's March 4 2010 article entitled "Les CANDU risquent l’emballement"
2009
- July 3, 2009: Letter to the Saskatoon StarPhoenix in response to July 3 editorial "Crucial to have rational debate on nuclear issues"
- July 1, 2009: Letter to the Globe and Mail in response to the June 29 article “Reactor design puts safety of plants into question”
- June 27, 2009: Letter to the Saskatoon StarPhoenix in response to the June 23 article "Nuke plants hike cancer risk: report"
